The FBI should not investigate Hillary Rodham Clinton over her email scandal, former acting Attorney General Sally Yates said Tuesday.
In an interview with MSNBC, Yates, a former acting attorney general under President George W. Bush, said she was surprised by how little attention the matter has received since her confirmation in January.
Yates, a Trump supporter, also said the FBI’s decision to not pursue charges against Clinton “is a big deal.”
“The public has a right to know, the FBI, as a bureau, has an obligation to protect and defend the integrity of the investigation,” she said.
“It’s not a question of whether they should prosecute or not prosecute.”
Yates said the bureau is not in a position to say that Clinton’s conduct is worse than that of former President Donald Trump, who was elected president in November.
Trump has said she should be prosecuted for mishandling classified information.
“I don’t know if you have the capacity to indict a president for that,” she told MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell.
“But if you’re going to prosecute a president, and it’s an administration decision, you better be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the president committed a crime.”
Yatsys remarks were the first by a senior federal law enforcement official to acknowledge the FBI had not opened a criminal investigation into Clinton.
Yate said she believes that the decision by the bureau to not file charges against her could have been made “in a different way” if she had been the subject of a criminal inquiry.
“It would have been my choice to say I’m going to cooperate and get to the bottom of this,” Yates said.
Politico – JAPAN (AP) The United State’s top court will not rule on whether the U.S. should hold the 2019 Summer Olympics in Tokyo or move the games to New Jersey.
The justices ruled Friday in favor of the U:N.
in the case of an athlete who sued the United States over a bid by Japan to host the 2024 Summer Olympics.
The court had ordered a new hearing to decide whether to uphold a ruling by a panel of the International Olympic Committee that Tokyo should bid.
It was the first time in U.N. history that a case over a contested bid has been dismissed.
Japan had argued that the IOC’s decision that Tokyo bid was based on an outdated “pre-existing framework,” and that the U.:N.
bid was fair.
The IOC said that Tokyo’s bid was not based on a “previous legal framework” and that its bid “did not exceed the minimum requirements for a fair and transparent bid.”
Current account, which is used to show how much cash the government makes and how much it spends on services and services, is used in a number of ways to determine how much money the government is spending and how it is spending it.
It can be used to assess the effectiveness of government spending.
And it can be an important measure of whether government has a budget surplus or deficit.
The current account is not a fair gauge of the actual amount of money the country has, because it does not take into account what the government spends on things like social security or health care.
But it does provide some important data on the country’s finances.
It’s also an important gauge of how well a country is doing economically.
So it’s a really important measure.
Current account The current estimate of the country is the amount of cash it makes and spends each month.
The Treasury Department estimates that it makes $11.2 trillion in revenue and spends $11,821,921.
That works out to about $1,000 per person.
But if you exclude the outlays of Social Security and Medicare, it’s still a pretty good figure.
But there are some problems with using the current account to calculate the nation’s total spending.
The first problem is that the current government has not published the current accounting figures.
So the official government estimate is a little fuzzy.
And the latest estimate from the Government Accountability Office, a congressional watchdog, has been a little more accurate.
That estimate is about $11 trillion.
But that means that the government’s actual spending is closer to $13 trillion.
The second problem is the current estimate is based on assumptions about the future that are uncertain.
For example, it assumes that the economy will grow at an annual rate of 3.2 percent over the next decade.
And that assumption is a bit fuzzy.
So using the actual government estimates is problematic.
A third problem is how the government calculates its current accounts.
The government estimates how much the government pays in taxes.
It uses the Treasury Department’s Current Account Statement, a detailed spreadsheet that shows how much taxes are collected and how they are distributed.
The Federal Reserve estimates how the money the Federal Reserve prints is used.
And then there’s the Treasury’s Current Operating Balance, which includes the government expenses and the spending it has.
Current accounts The Treasury estimates that the average person spends $1.6 trillion on things such as food, clothing, and health care each year.
The average person consumes about $8.1 trillion of this spending each year, or about $5,000 a person.
The actual amount spent on goods and services in a year is a good way to measure how well the country does economically.
But using current accounts is tricky.
There are a number problems with this measure.
It is based almost entirely on current accounts and it is based a lot on what the current Treasury Secretary says about what he thinks is the best estimate of what the economy is doing.
For instance, the Treasury estimates the economy grew by 3.5 percent in 2016, the best figure of any estimate.
But the Treasury Secretary said in a speech in May that the economic growth rate was more like 3.1 percent.
So Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has been pushing for an estimate that would better reflect what’s going on in the economy.
And even the current current estimate, by the Treasury, is a rough estimate.
So if the current estimates are too high, that could hurt the U.S. economy in the future.
Another problem is using current accounting to measure spending.
If you look at spending, for instance, it is hard to see how much of a dent there is in the current accounts as a measure of how the country spends.
If we look at the amount the government has spent on health care, it would look good if the government spent a lot of money on it, but it’s hard to tell how much, because that spending is so small.
That’s because health care spending varies so much by state.
Health care spending is different in different states.
In some states, it goes directly to people who need it.
In others, it costs money to treat people who are sick or injured.
But in some places, like Florida, people pay premiums to health care providers that get reimbursed through the state.
If a person’s insurance company is in a state that has higher health care costs, then that person might pay more out-of-pocket for health care than someone who is healthy and who is not insured.
In that way, the health care system can be very costly to some people.
This is not necessarily the case in every state, but the U,S.
spends a lot more on health insurance than it does on health services for the poor and the elderly.
This makes health care expensive for everyone.
The U.K. spends much less on health than
Marvel’s Captain America: The Winter Soldier won’t be out until April 4, but it’ll bring up a lot of history that’s been in the comics.
EW has the exclusive first look at the movie’s poster.
Captain America is a symbol of American strength and determination in the face of great odds.
The movie tells the story of Steve Rogers, the Winter Soldier, who became the first Avenger in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, and is now the leader of the Avengers.
He’s also an icon of freedom and progress in the world.
He is a man of the people, a champion of justice, a man who has the courage to stand up to injustice, and a man whose name will live on for generations.
Read more about Captain America.
Read the official synopsis for Captain America’s Civil War:
The internet is in dire need of a reboot, especially if we’re going to tackle climate change.
With the recent hack of the Democratic National Committee and the Trump campaign, the internet is no longer in a place where everyone can see what you’re up to or where you’re going.
So, if you’re new to this, you might be thinking that it’s not worth your while to spend $60 on an antenna, since you’ll probably never be able to use it.
Well, think again.
The internet can be a fantastic tool to bring people together and build a better future, and it can also be a terrible nightmare.
Here are 10 reasons why.
You can still use your free internet service without paying a monthly fee.
In fact, you can still enjoy free internet without paying.
The Federal Communications Commission, the government body that oversees the internet, has stated that “the Commission has no intention of ending net neutrality.”
In other words, you don’t have to pay to use the internet.
In the United States, this means that you can use your internet connection to watch videos and access content at home, and you can download videos and apps for free.
The Internet is not like a cable or satellite TV service.
You don’t pay for the internet you get from cable or from satellite TV.
Instead, you pay for your internet service.
This is called net neutrality.
When you go to a web page, you’re only paying for what’s in front of you.
The same goes for applications you download.
This means that the internet’s slow, unreliable and expensive to use, which makes it less likely to bring in new users.
The only thing you pay to have online is your internet provider.
If you’re looking to get online, you probably won’t pay a dime.
You’re likely to have to use some form of service like a pay-per-use plan, which allows you to choose how you want to pay.
If that’s your plan, you’ll be able access many of the same services as other internet users.
You may never be charged for using the internet again.
There’s no question that internet usage is a huge issue.
A survey by the Pew Research Center found that more than half of Americans say that they use the web less frequently, and a whopping 43 percent say they have to deal with the effects of broadband.
The vast majority of these people also said that they don’t even want to think about paying for internet.
The net neutrality rules make it very difficult to do business online.
You probably already know this, but the FCC recently voted to repeal the 2015 net neutrality rule.
This meant that ISPs could no longer discriminate in how they provide their services to their customers.
This created a lot of problems for startups, as they couldn’t compete with giant corporations, which could be a big threat to their business.
The FCC’s vote also eliminated the FCC’s requirement that ISPs provide internet service in a timely manner, and allowed for faster speeds for online content.
The federal government does not regulate the internet for its own good.
The US government does.
But it does this in order to protect the internet and the free flow of information.
The Department of Commerce is charged with enforcing these rules, and the government has been taking an increasingly adversarial stance towards internet service providers in recent years.
The rules are outdated.
The 2015 net-neutrality rules were passed to prevent ISPs from throttling or blocking websites and services.
In a recent ruling, the FCC ruled that this is a violation of net neutrality, and that ISPs must treat all internet traffic equally.
So now, ISPs have a big advantage over everyone else, even if they are a big corporation with huge profits.
You have no choice but to pay up.
The current net- neutrality rules only apply to the internet services that you get on a monthly basis.
But if you subscribe to a streaming service, you may also have to give up a certain amount of your monthly internet bill, because it’s capped.
This makes the internet less accessible to many people, including students and people who don’t yet have a home broadband connection.
The government has a vested interest in keeping the internet a free and democratic place.
There are no laws protecting you from having your internet access cut off.
The entire internet is controlled by a network of internet companies, which can block you at any time without warning.
The very existence of these companies makes it impossible for you to control what your internet experience is like.
And this is what has made the internet so important.
The future of the internet may not be as great as you think.
But you can be certain that the world has a lot more to look forward to in the future.
What is your opinion about net neutrality?
What is the legal status of same sex marriage?
The issue has been debated by the courts for decades, but the law was introduced in England and Wales in 2015 and Scotland last year.
It was not legally recognised until this year.
The first marriage was held in 2014.
Who is allowed to marry?
You can only get married if you are 18 years old and have been living together for at least one year.
If you are a married person and you want to get married, you must apply to the Office for Marriage and Civil Partnership (OMC) and tell them you are in a same-gender relationship.
You will be asked to explain your reasons for wanting to marry.
A person in a gay or lesbian relationship can get married by saying: “I feel I should be married to another man”.
They will then need to get a court order to have a ceremony.
How many people can get legally married in the UK?
There are currently around 5,000 same-year civil partnerships in England, Wales and Scotland.
These marriages are recognised by the OMC, but there are currently about 10,000 people in a legal same-age civil partnership.
Are civil partnerships recognised by both the state and by the church?
The Church of England says it recognises civil partnerships, although the Church of Scotland does not.
It says it has a policy of not endorsing any particular form of civil union.
The Church has previously supported same- sex marriage, but it has been a divisive issue.
It has also been a point of contention in the US and Canada.
The American Supreme Court has ruled that a federal law banning same- gender marriage violates the US constitution.
The US Congress has passed legislation allowing states to make it easier for same- age couples to get legally recognised.
How do I get married?
You must get married in a civil ceremony and the person you marry must live with you.
You can get the marriage registered with the OPC if you live in a country where it is legal.
This can take years, but if you want your marriage to be recognised by another country, you will need to apply to a judge.
You may be required to prove that your relationship is compatible with the other person.
It can take three years for the court to rule.
Who has legal responsibility for a civil partnership?
If your partner is living with you in a foreign country, they are responsible for paying the costs of a civil marriage.
Your partner will be given a certificate stating that they are not eligible to marry another person.
If they marry another couple, they will be required by law to pay their partner’s legal fees.
If both of you are living together in the same country, it is likely that the state will also provide you with a certificate.
Can a marriage be made legal if both people in the couple are legally married?
If you and your partner are in the country legally, the marriage is not recognised.
However, if you and someone you know are married in another country and living together, they may be able to legally marry.
However they may also have to pay the costs.
They will be able apply for a court case to have their civil marriage recognised.
The OMC says there are no legal barriers to gay or straight couples being married.
What happens if a marriage is registered?
The legal marriage will be recognised if both of the following are true: both people who have married are living in the jurisdiction.
If one of you is in a different country and the other is, the two people must be legally married.
The couple may still have to provide proof of their relationship.
They must get a certificate that they have not been living apart.
If either of you cannot prove that you are legally related, you may need to go to court.
What is a civil contract?
A civil contract is a legal agreement between two people.
It does not need to be registered or recognised.
What does it mean if I am not legally related to someone?
If someone is not legally married, they can legally divorce you and get you back in a legally recognised civil partnership if they want.
If someone in a relationship with you is not in a recognised civil union, you can apply to get them registered as your partner.
They can get a declaration from the court that they do not need a civil relationship to be together.
They may also apply to have you married as your new partner.
What are the legal consequences if I break a civil commitment?
If both people have broken a civil engagement, the court may decide that they need to break their civil commitment.
They are likely to take away your passport, change your address, take your bank details and even revoke your driver’s licence.
If the court says you cannot continue living together and if you cannot get married legally, you could be in court for an attempted fraud charge.
What do I do if I have a civil partner?
If a civil couple have broken their civil engagement and you cannot be married legally and you need to live with
- Mexico says US should get out of NAFTA, Mexico says no
- An earthquake in the Dallas area causes at least four deaths
- How to use CDC’s new 3D Maps for NASA’s Mars 2020 rover
- How to watch the first NBA Draft in Los Angeles: Live updates
- How to get the best out of your mobile phone with the right phone charger